Friday, April 27, 2012

Cricital 4-27-12


In Terrance Hayes’ book “Lighthead” a reoccurring theme thatI noticed was language. In several of the poems there was talk about specific languageas well as the big picture of language. Language in Terrance Hayes’ “Lighthead”includes the changes in structure and tone, the use of repetition and thehistory of language.

The first poem I want to talk about is “Lighthead’s Guide tothe Galaxy”. In this poem Hayes writes “I know all words come from preexistingwords and divide until our pronouncements develop selves”. This was a greatline that talks about the uses of words and how they all come from other words.He is making an announcement to the people and stating that language divides upuntil it can develop itself in the present. I took this to mean that eventhough there are some words that are used now from the past they may not havethe same meanings now. I also liked the lines “Not what you see, but what youperceive: that’s poetry”. This summed up what we are doing in our class when wediscuss the poems we’ve read. It’s not just the words on the page |(not whatyou see) but it is the meaning behind what is written (what you perceive) that makes a piece of writing poetry.

The language in “Support the Troops” is a little strange butI really liked the line about “And I admit my awe looking on the marine with atalent for making the eagle tattooed across his back rear his talons”. To me, thedescription paints a picture in your mind of what this would actually look like.|I think that is what language does. When you use descriptive language, youpaint a picture for the reader.

I also wanted to talk about the repetition used in “Lighthead’sGuide to Addiction”. The writer states “I am addicted to repetition which is aform of history”. In this poem he uses the repetition of being addicted to onething then there is this solution, but once you’re addicted to the solution thenyou have to find another solution. This form of repetition that he uses in thispoem is very powerful and shows the vicious cycle of addiction. When he statesthat repetition is a form of history it brings up another good point about language.Language has been around a long time and the interpretations of it havechanged. We interpret these poems in a certain way because of how we werebrought up and in the time period we were brought up in. In the future thesepoems might be interpreted differently, especially the poems about certain eventsthat happened in our history. The poem about Katrina is something that weremember very clearly because it didn’t happen that long ago and we know howdifficult it was for those families. If someone were to read this poem in thefuture it might not have the same affect on them because they are not as familiarwith the story.

The changes in tone in the poems from the beginning section to the end section are very noticeable. In the first section the language was more abstract and was not really talkingabout specifics. In the second section it seemed to have a more dramatic tone.These were the poems that seemed to talk about specific events and tragedies. Overall,language was proven to be a major theme in “Lighthead”. Language was usedthrough the changes in tone, the history and the use of repetition.

1 comment:

  1. Megan,

    Your topic is somewhat vague and huge (hugue?). And yet, I actually think you're selecting good examples when you talk about the Lighthead poems. In those Hayes does seem to be discussing language itself, not just using language to describe. Your second example from the soldier poem doesn't fit that pattern, though.

    So, I'd stick with the two Lighthead quotations and then expand your thinking on those a little bit. First, Hayes tells us about the growth of language over the years. Then he tells us that a particular use of language is a way of expressing personal history and linguistic history. Those seem related and worth your time.

    While I like your reading of the eagle image, you see how that's different, right? It's literal and descriptive while the other stuff is theoretical, philosophical.

    By the end of your second-to-last paragraph, I'm losing you a little bit. How did the line about repetition being a form of history lead you to all that talk about interpretation? You're smart to point out that we will interpret differently in the future, but I'm not sure why you've started in on that topic.

    So, anyway, look at the Lighthead quotes again. In both, he seems to be suggesting that what we say, and what we repeat (perhaps compulsively) make us who we are. That, in the words of Joan Didion, "We tell ourselves stories in order to live."

    I'd go even further to suggest that Hayes might want us to see that the ways that we change our own meanings and our own interpretations also changes who we are.

    As we keep watching, reading, listening to, and engaging with art, we should be continuously enjoying and refining who we are.

    That's big stuff. And your post is getting me there. Thanks for introducing these ideas. I just think you could have even more fun with them and be a little bit clearer.

    DW

    ReplyDelete